<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LG Electronics 42PC1D or Samsung PS42E7HD ??</title>
	<link>http://youthinside.org/2008/05/21/lg-electronics-42pc1d-or-samsung-ps42e7hd/</link>
	<description>All About Shopping</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 08:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: wondergeezer</title>
		<link>http://youthinside.org/2008/05/21/lg-electronics-42pc1d-or-samsung-ps42e7hd/#comment-1733</link>
		<dc:creator>wondergeezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 15:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://youthinside.org/2008/05/21/lg-electronics-42pc1d-or-samsung-ps42e7hd/#comment-1733</guid>
		<description>yep the samsung</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep the samsung</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fecomosis</title>
		<link>http://youthinside.org/2008/05/21/lg-electronics-42pc1d-or-samsung-ps42e7hd/#comment-1732</link>
		<dc:creator>fecomosis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 21:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://youthinside.org/2008/05/21/lg-electronics-42pc1d-or-samsung-ps42e7hd/#comment-1732</guid>
		<description>OK if you want a TV that will last a year then go for Samsung.

LG iam not too fimilar with.

Samsung and Phillips/Magnavox have the highest percentage failure rates above all others.

Just because it has alot of features, dosnt mean it will last a long time.

I recommend going for these brands.
Sony
Toshiba
Mitsubishi
Pioneer Elite
Hitachi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK if you want a TV that will last a year then go for Samsung.</p>
<p>LG iam not too fimilar with.</p>
<p>Samsung and Phillips/Magnavox have the highest percentage failure rates above all others.</p>
<p>Just because it has alot of features, dosnt mean it will last a long time.</p>
<p>I recommend going for these brands.<br />
Sony<br />
Toshiba<br />
Mitsubishi<br />
Pioneer Elite<br />
Hitachi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Count</title>
		<link>http://youthinside.org/2008/05/21/lg-electronics-42pc1d-or-samsung-ps42e7hd/#comment-1731</link>
		<dc:creator>The Count</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 07:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://youthinside.org/2008/05/21/lg-electronics-42pc1d-or-samsung-ps42e7hd/#comment-1731</guid>
		<description>I would get an HDTV LCD Samsung 42". LCD is by far the best technology &#038; HD ready does not have a built in HD tuner, so in order to get an HD picture, you will need something that will feed an HD signal to it, that has a tuner in it. I got the HDTV with tuner built in. Much less hassle. Sony got out of the Plasma technology a while ago, because they knew it would have issues like the ones showing up now. DLP isn't any better. My personal choice : Sony/Samsung LCD HDTV 42".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would get an HDTV LCD Samsung 42&#8243;. LCD is by far the best technology &#038; HD ready does not have a built in HD tuner, so in order to get an HD picture, you will need something that will feed an HD signal to it, that has a tuner in it. I got the HDTV with tuner built in. Much less hassle. Sony got out of the Plasma technology a while ago, because they knew it would have issues like the ones showing up now. DLP isn&#8217;t any better. My personal choice : Sony/Samsung LCD HDTV 42&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lets talk</title>
		<link>http://youthinside.org/2008/05/21/lg-electronics-42pc1d-or-samsung-ps42e7hd/#comment-1730</link>
		<dc:creator>lets talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 10:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://youthinside.org/2008/05/21/lg-electronics-42pc1d-or-samsung-ps42e7hd/#comment-1730</guid>
		<description>samsung has better picture, LG 42PC1D is in the repair shop less. LG is Zenith. might want to see if the same model in zenith is cheaper</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>samsung has better picture, LG 42PC1D is in the repair shop less. LG is Zenith. might want to see if the same model in zenith is cheaper</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redneckindian892</title>
		<link>http://youthinside.org/2008/05/21/lg-electronics-42pc1d-or-samsung-ps42e7hd/#comment-1729</link>
		<dc:creator>redneckindian892</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 23:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://youthinside.org/2008/05/21/lg-electronics-42pc1d-or-samsung-ps42e7hd/#comment-1729</guid>
		<description>i personally would go with the Samsung i have had nothing but bad luck with LG products they break and just fall apart soon after you buy them well all the stuff i have gotten from them has and another thing i have herd that plasma tv's burn out faster then LCD tv's</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i personally would go with the Samsung i have had nothing but bad luck with LG products they break and just fall apart soon after you buy them well all the stuff i have gotten from them has and another thing i have herd that plasma tv&#8217;s burn out faster then LCD tv&#8217;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
